Di Yanni: Rocking Out The Classics

I definitely think that variety is the spice of life. Cliche or not the phrase rings true to that of Critical Perspectives! (notice sarcasm here) Some of these perspectives I found intriguing and some I found pretty cooky. I draw to the whole idea of Reader Response because I feel that literature is something that is inherently liked with the reader. Without a reader, there is just no point. We need to look at the connection the works make with the reader, because I feel that is what is most important. On the other end of the broad spectrum, past the squished box filled with Marxists and Feminists fighting for their causes, there is the Psycological Approach. God Forbid if I ever publish something better than mediocre I hope that no members of this approach deem my work suitable for annalysis. I find it some what creepy that, as Di Yanni points out, that these people are digging through old diares and asking the author's parents what their kids were like. Stay out of my mind please and judge me based on skill, not my capibility of staying sane and quite boring.